Maybe she’s just happy about what she wrote and just want to leave it this way and just keep making money with that. It worked till now why should she change it if she’s happy with her situation?
That’s funny that you seem to feel that she owe you something, is that why you’re so frustrated with her ? Because opposite to Kurumada known as the Manga George Lucas she’s not letting her manga turning into 50th different spinoff?

(That’s a legit question)
Question 1 - Why do you keep editing your post into a milder one? People have already seen your spicy version.
Question 2 - If you're happy with the way things are and are fan of Naoko Takeuchi the holy mother who's actions are not to be questioned, why can't there be people who are not happy with things and are not fan of her?
It's not like people are saying to go to Japan and burn her as a witch.
I have said it a
LOT of times -
I do not want anything from her.
Hell, Sailor Moon is not as rebootable as Dragon Ball, Saint Seiya, Digimon or Precure.
Plus anything from her would simply be 'half-baked'.
Quite the contrary in fact! I wish she never comes out of retirement and stays at home, spending her joyful days drinking Royal Milk Tea while having her nails done.
The problem is that she isn't letting things go as they are.
She is ridiculous in her demands and makes other people's lives more difficult.
Yes, I know she's a millionaire and you're a mega big fan of that fact, you've said it enough times to me.
However that doesn't make her the Queen of the world which she clearly thinks she is with her mind bogging demands.
I care more about the pain and grievances of the peasants instead of that of the Pompous Queen.
Plain and simple.
Kurumada Productions calls Overture part of a メディアミックス
here and Masami Kurumada also talks about wanting his new storyline to be told in media mix in
Overture's pamphlet.
And like I said he intended to make a sequel to Hades in anime format instead of making it into a manga first.
I don't see where there's this reboot you're talking about.
Same source,「そして、全三部作になるような形で作りたい」.
Just like I said, from the beginning Kurumada intended the final arc to be divided into 3 Acts/Chapters.
We can talk about why so many Saint Seiya projects have been cancelled or failed in the last two decades. Overture's production was messy, TMS overplayed their hand, Saintia Sho had a poor budget, the movie might just be a pet project, but the bottom line is that they all failed. If you don't take the time to detail the circumstances that led to Crystal's rushed animation every time you talk about its failings, I don't see why we must be so demure when talking about the many quantifiable flops in Saint Seiya.
Stop.Hallucinating.
I have always argued and explained my points about anything I've discussed on this forum.
If you don't think they are valid - that's your right.
Quite the contrary, you're the one whose always bringing half-baked info and misinformation about Saint Seiya which the majority of the forum would take by your word considering they'll probably not bother to check the facts for themselves.
If after 10 years, you're still gonna come with the excuse they had only 2 weeks, they were outsourced to the Philippines, the same can be said for 3/4 of Toei's productions and they don't rival Crystal's abysmal quality.
What I would notice is the plus sign after 2006 in your original "Saint Seiya's revival (2003-2006+)" quote, and that plus sign would include many flops, one of which cost Toei several millions of dollars.
I suppose it wasn't evident to you that when I purposely mentioned
2003-2006+, I meant the projects that debuted in that era - Next Dimension, Episode G and Lost Canvas which were success and even continue to get new content and financial success even today -
meaning their success still continues today.
I didn't know I had to blurt out everything to the detail.
I don't disagree but what made Soul of Gold successful was that it sold discs and toys. Viewership is important but Toei's reports measure success in sales (and singles out Crystal as a successful seller).
Then, pray tell explain why they changed their oh-so successful strategy 2 times?
I guess it's out of pure love for us fans.
Posting good scenes doesn't make the ugly ones go away. You claimed the OVAs always maintained good perspectives and anatomy and that just isn't true. If someone replied to the awful web Crystal screenshots with a bunch of good ones, you could rightfully call it coping and that's what you're doing with Inferno.
It's not just the art, the OVAs after Sanctuary have awful animations and it's all the more disappointing because Sanctuary was impeccable and its sequel had scenes like this:
Stop.Hallucinating.
The Hades Inferno and Elysion OVAs still look better than Crystal I/II.
Sure they barely have any animation especially for the last 2 Inferno OVAs and pretty much all of Elysion and the art is still outstanding.
Characters with complicated armors are still drawn correctly, perspectives are respected, animators still know how anatomy works no matter how far the camera is to the character, characters are super expressive.
The main problem is the very boring screenplay with a storyboard completely faithful to Kurumada's.
When did I mentioned it was perfect or even talked about the quality of the animation???
You're implying I'm cherry picking?
Ok, then since there are so many awful, poorer than Crystal's art, in these infernal abyss that are the Inferno/Elysion OVAs, allow me to pick and choose a couple of those randos (rando shots that completely obliterate those 2-3 'high quality' shots of Crystal that fans like to claim would need a high budget to produce btw).
And the Elysion OVAs had arguably an even poorer budget than Inferno or Crystal considering most episodes had
only 2 main animators in charge.
If you want more samples just ask, there are a couple of hundreds more.
@Memelord_Yoshi I gotta need your screen caps to cleanse the lens of people from the atrocities I just posted above lol
I haven't said anything about Crystal's quality or respecting Naoko Takeuchi, please stop hallucinating. All I'm pointing out is that you excuse or disregard every failure, including multimillionaire losses, in Saint Seiya and Kurumada Productions while criticizing Sailor Moon and PNP for less economically damaging projects. It is an obvious and massive double standard.
In case you hadn't figured it out I was refering to your posts in general and your stance that anyone who cricitizes Takeuchi/the manga/Crystermos is in the wrong and shouldn't.
Anyways~
Hmm... it seems that it's more because of poor management and marketing decisions that Saint Seiya had flops instead of the source material just being bad - something that fans rightfully criticize just like the over exposure of Gold Saints in the mangas.
But I guess you're arguing the opposite?
And of course Sailor Moon would be less economically damaging because they are poor to average budget productions.
All you're proving is that Toei doesn't have enough faith in Sailor Moon to invest in it like in it's other IPs.